Dr. Kevin Anderson (genetics) talks with Ian Juby on Genesis Week

Dr. Kevin Anderson (genetics) talks with Ian Juby on Genesis Week

Views:1919|Rating:4.24|View Time:39:19Minutes|Likes:73|Dislikes:13

This is the complete interview with Dr. Kevin Anderson (geneticist) regarding “molecular clocks.”

Random References:

iDinosaur project:

Phylogeny and beyond: Scientific, historical, and conceptual significance of the first tree of life, Pace, et. al, PNAS Vol. 109 No 4

Creation, Evolution and the Molecular Revolution, Kevin L. Anderson, Creation Matters, Vol 8, No 5, September/October 2003

The p21 Cdk-Interacting Protein Cipl Is
a Potent Inhibitor of Gl Cyclin-Dependent Kinases
Harper, et. al, Cell, Vol 75, 805-816, November 9, 1993

Conjugal transfer of transposon Tn1545 into the cellulolytic
bacterium Eubacterium cellulosolvens
Anderson, et. al, Letters in Applied Microbiology 1998, 26, 35–37

31 thoughts on “Dr. Kevin Anderson (genetics) talks with Ian Juby on Genesis Week”

  1. I am pained and saddened by the unethical behaviour of some who proclaim the gospel yet contravene the standards of honesty and ethics demanded by Jesus himself.

    Kevin Anderson is going around claiming credit for work done by others, and even using plagiarised material in books he authors without reference to the true sources.

    Kevin, have you heard of Mark Armitage and the excellent work he is doing in the area of Dinosaur soft tissue? Why are you endeavouring to profit from his work while giving every impression that it is your own?

    I call on you to repent and come clean publicly lest you come under the discipline of God for what you are doing.

  2. Sony Singh, you seem to be getting rather upset over the controversial naming of the Mitochondrial Eve. How about the facts being presented? You dismiss the video as inaccurate purely based off of irrelevant matters. Yes, Dr. Kevin Anderson may have a different view than you, but that does not make him wrong.

  3. Wow, just wow. Never heard such utter crap from an educated person before. Ian Juby is a well know ass, but the other fellow is worst.

    What the hell is a neo darwinist?
    He said mitochondrial eve was named as a joke??? We named planets and moons after Roman and Greek myths, does this validate them?
    "There were other women around at the time" and then Ian is completely stunned when she is dated to 6,000 years, but forgets that there were other women around at that time.

    The only thing this video proves is that you can get a Ph.D, but you can't shake off scary stories you were told as a child. I feel sorry for his students.

  4. 2 "evolution classes" will not teach you all the evidence of evolution. Especially from how long ago he took the class. Much information has happened in the last couple decades that shows how species are connected

  5. thanks so much for the info! i have been studying this subject for the past few days and many of my questions were answered. so….now i'm a subscriber.

  6. @fughe you said "intentionally arranged the classification to make them related" – Huh? You think that's how science works? By arbitrary guesses? No, taxonomy looks at the similarities and differences in both physical traits and DNA to determine how species are related. Did god create all the animals in this elaborate hierarchical arrangement to fool us?

  7. I was a little surprised that his video even allowed uncensored comments in the first place – I wonder how long that will last?
    He's obviously aware that his beliefs don't stand up to close inspection.
    I love his ignorant yet smug style and borderline-unhinged giggling – I haven't come across a more entertaining fool on YouTube since Shock of God dried up and blew away

  8. What a missed opportunity! If only they could have done a head to head between this creationist geneticist and a non-creationist geneticist

    I feel somehow that we are only being given one side of the argument

  9. Hello Ian , good show as per , what do evolutionists say is their yard stick to the age of the earth , why do they [ exactly ] go by to say evolution is true or say is true , they worked out in the 80's that eve existed about six thousand years ago , i would say six to ten thousand years , but let us leave the nit picking out of this , anyway could they do the same with adam , or other animals for that matter , of course i don't think that can be done for obvious reasons ,
    keep up the good work

  10. "The Qur'an at best, is hardly scientific"

    That doesn't have anything to do with genetic clocks, nor is that using what the guy said in the video to reinforce that christian creationist beliefs are true and the others are false.

    "As for Hinduism, the gods of the indus valley people were brought to them by the Greeks"

    So, how do these revelations about genetic clocks reinforce christian creationism and not greek polytheistic creation?

    Also, that's not accurate

  11. Israel is number 3 supplier of produce and provide EU with most of their produce, the land was desolate before Israelites returned. more proof.Amos 9:14 I will bring back my exiled people Israel; they will rebuild the ruined cities and live in them. They will plant vineyards and drink their wine; they will make gardens and eat their fruit. 15 I will plant Israel in their own land, never again to be uprooted from the land I have given them, says the LORD your God."

  12. Hi arfived4 this is just one of the many prophesies that have come to pass. One even foretold of the Arab , Russian secret alliance. Dr. Kent Hovind Creastion seminiars on youtube have some really good scientific evidence and Ron Wyatt "banned proof the Bible is real" on youtube has 8 parts and is archeological proof of the Stories mentioned in the Bible. I hope you choose to watch them you will be amazed and your eyes will be opened the Christians were right all along. God bless.

  13. written thousands of years ago, it foretold what is happening today. Pslam 83, there was no Israel when this was written.That is how we know YAHWEH created the world".O God, do not remain silent;do not turn a deaf ear,do not stand aloof, O God.
    2 See how your enemies growl,how your foes rear their heads.3 With cunning they conspire against your people; they plot against those you cherish. “Come,” they say, “let us destroy them as a nation,so that Israel’s name is remembered no more.”

  14. Well done, Ian. Darwinism is a taughtology. They teach it – you should believe it. We need to understand Anderson's point that research by Darwinists who credit their successful experiments to evolutionary thinking just do not read enough to understand how creationists thinking would lead to the same experiment. This is very important. The vast majority of people do not have a second point of view to reference.

  15. How do the problem with genetic clocks mentioned support christian creationism specifically, and not islamic creationism or hindu creationism?

  16. Great interview, lots of insight! My only question is how long can evolutionists keep this charade going before their house of cards come tumbling down?

  17. Yes, evolution is a very sick joke!
    I can see how people just believe whatever are told because they think the issues are too complicated or them to understand.
    I run into it all the time. They hold on to their faith more than they hold on to the facts and they are surprised at how much their belief breaks down.
    Genetics is like a glider that sometimes "goes up" and sometimes goes down and eventually, it will not be able to return to the hights that it used to attain without help.

  18. Love it. Incredible how Darwinists blind themselves to the simple facts to hold tightly on to their inane theory (uh hum world view, religion).
    That's pretty much all we ever see from them. And then they have the audacity to say that they are the real scientists!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *